On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:04:28AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 09/10/2020 15.08, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 12:17:56AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > >> On 07/10/2020 00.02, Simon Glass wrote: > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > >>> > >>> Is there a way to add a test for this? > >> > >> Not that I can think of, other than finding some BE board and hooking it > >> up in some CI. Apparently not very many people use verified boot on BE > >> platforms :( or at least they don't follow upstream U-Boot closely. > > > > We have tests for verified boot for sandbox. Can we not expand them to > > run on qemu* including ppce500? > > Perhaps. I didn't know sandbox was supposed to be buildable for other > arches than x86ish. I just tried doing the naive thing, > > $ export ARCH=powerpc > $ export CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-gnu- > $ make sandbox_defconfig > $ make -j8 > include/config_distro_bootcmd.h:335:3: error: #error "sandbox EFI > support is only supported on ARM and x86" > > After trimming the .config to git rid of that, I get a million other > warnings and errors, so that doesn't seem to be the right way.
Sorry, I meant the literal QEMU targets that we use. > Can we please apply the patch to unbreak actual boards even if there's > no regression test for it? Yes, sorry it wasn't clear. I will pick this up soon, with a bunch of other stuff. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
