Hi Simon, On 07. 09. 20 15:57, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 03:01, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> On 07. 09. 20 3:43, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 06:30, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 03. 09. 20 13:16, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >>>>> On 9/3/20 1:03 PM, Michal Simek wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> We have several use cases where customers want to partition memory by >>>>>> putting NS images above 4GB. On Xilinx arm 64bit SOC 0-2GB can be used >>>>>> for >>>>>> others CPU in the systems (like R5) or for secure sw. >>>>>> Currently there is limitation in SPL to record load/entry addresses in >>>>>> 64bit format because they are recorded in 32bit only. >>>>>> This series add support for it. >>>>>> Patches have been tested on Xilinx ZynqMP zcu102 board in SD bootmode >>>>>> with >>>>>> images generated by binman. Because u-boot is using >>>>>> CONFIG_POSITION_INDEPENDENT it can be put to others 4k aligned addresses >>>>>> and there is no real need to build it to certain offset. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Michal >>>>> >>>>> Hello Michal, >>>>> >>>>> does this series require changes to doc/uImage.FIT/source_file_format.txt? >>>> >>>> I am not changing fit format. I am just changing how SPL records >>>> loadables in DT fit-images node. And also series is using FIT functions >>>> for reading these properties (at least in this version). >>> >>> Well I think there should be some mention of the 32/64 bit issue added >>> to the FIT docs. How about adding an example with 64-bit addresses? >> >> git grep "fit-images" doc/ >> and output is 0. It means we really don't have any documentation for >> fit-images embed node. >> It means we should create one. >> >> /fit-images are related to loadables property that's why I think make >> sense to document them together. >> >> What about doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt? > > Sounds good.
v2 sent. Thanks, Michal
