On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 08:27 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Monday 13 September 2010 07:34:40 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > BOOTFLAG_COLD and BOOTFLAG_WARM have identical definitions for every > > > PowerPC board, so share a common definition. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <pty...@xes-inc.com> > > > --- > > > It looks like there are only a few boards (5) that use the warm/cold > > > boot concept, maybe we should remove this largely unused feature? > > > Or at least remove it for most CPU types? Is anyone out there > > > using it? > > > > I added this with the very first versions of PPCBoot, more than a > > decade ago. I've never seen it really used in the code. > > > > I vote for removing it. > > Me too: > > Acked-by: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>
Sounds good, I'll resubmit. Getting rid of the BOOTFLAG_* defines will make bd->bi_bootflags unused. What's the policy on modifying the bd_info structure? Leave an unused bi_bootflags field to prevent breakage of OSes? Best, Peter _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
