Jens Scharsig schrieb: > Am 2010-08-31 09:36, schrieb Reinhard Meyer: >> Hi, >> } >> -- 1.6.0.2 >> >> Applied to u-boot-atmel/next >> Thanks, >> >> Reinhard >> > What is the reason for the new branch/Custodian Tree u-boot-atmel. Hello,
one reason is that AVR32 and AT91 share alot in the peripheral building blocks, so many drivers are both for AVR32 and AT91. I will try to make sure changes to drivers in that area are not breaking either architecture. On that behalf I'd like a briefing why there is at91_emac AND macb? macb works for AVR32AP700x and (at least) for AT91SAM9260/9G20/9XE. What is the deal with at91_emac? Is it required for some AT91's because macb does not work there? Does it provide better "results" than macb? Best Regards Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
