On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:59:13 -0400 Ben Gardiner <bengardi...@nanometrics.ca> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: > > On 08/27/2010 04:46 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > >> For now, I guess don't worry about sharing the code. > > > > Plus, I've got some changes to the NAND command/util code I'm about to send > > out that touch this -- if sharing is going to be a pain, I can go back to > > the version that only passes back "fits with bad blocks", "fits with no bad > > blocks", or "doesn't fit", and doesn't deal with 64-bit sizes because it's > > only used by read/write which is limited by pointer size. That simpler > > version is 128 bytes smaller in my build. > > I imagine you don't have to go back. I already did; it's smaller and slightly simpler for what it currently needs to do. It would still be easy to switch to using the MTD function later. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
