On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:59:13 -0400
Ben Gardiner <bengardi...@nanometrics.ca> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote:
> > On 08/27/2010 04:46 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> For now, I guess don't worry about sharing the code.
> >
> > Plus, I've got some changes to the NAND command/util code I'm about to send
> > out that touch this -- if sharing is going to be a pain, I can go back to
> > the version that only passes back "fits with bad blocks", "fits with no bad
> > blocks", or "doesn't fit", and doesn't deal with 64-bit sizes because it's
> > only used by read/write which is limited by pointer size.  That simpler
> > version is 128 bytes smaller in my build.
> 
> I imagine you don't have to go back.

I already did; it's smaller and slightly simpler for what it currently
needs to do.  It would still be easy to switch to using the MTD
function later.

-Scott

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to