Am 2020-05-21 16:13, schrieb Bin Meng:
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:40 AM Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc> wrote:

It is possible to specify a device tree node for an USB device. This is
useful if you have a static USB setup and want to use aliases which
point to these nodes, like on the Raspberry Pi.
The nodes are matched against their hub port number, the compatible
strings are not matched for now.

Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc>
---
This is a new patch in v5:
  Fixes the ethernet0 alias on Raspberry Pis. This has never been
  working, but wasn't a problem until recently. Patch 2/2 changes
  the allocation of the numbers and reserves possible aliases.

drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c b/drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c
index cb79dfbbd5..f42c0625cb 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c
@@ -494,6 +494,35 @@ static int usb_match_one_id(struct usb_device_descriptor *desc,
        return usb_match_one_id_intf(desc, int_desc, id);
 }

+static ofnode usb_get_ofnode(struct udevice *hub, int port)
+{
+       ofnode node;
+       u32 reg;
+
+       if (!dev_has_of_node(hub))
+               return ofnode_null();
+
+       /*
+ * The USB controller and its USB hub are two different udevices,
+        * but the device tree has only one node for both. Thus we are
+        * assigning this node to both udevices.
+        * If port is zero, the controller scans its root hub, thus we
+        * are using the same ofnode as the controller here.
+        */
+       if (!port)
+               return dev_ofnode(hub);
+
+       ofnode_for_each_subnode(node, dev_ofnode(hub)) {
+               if (ofnode_read_u32(node, "reg", &reg))
+                       continue;
+
+               if (reg == port)
+                       return node;
+       }
+
+       return ofnode_null();
+}
+
 /**
  * usb_find_and_bind_driver() - Find and bind the right USB driver
  *
@@ -502,13 +531,14 @@ static int usb_match_one_id(struct usb_device_descriptor *desc,
 static int usb_find_and_bind_driver(struct udevice *parent,
struct usb_device_descriptor *desc, struct usb_interface_descriptor *iface,
-                                   int bus_seq, int devnum,
+                                   int bus_seq, int devnum, int port,
                                    struct udevice **devp)
 {
        struct usb_driver_entry *start, *entry;
        int n_ents;
        int ret;
        char name[30], *str;
+       ofnode node = usb_get_ofnode(parent, port);

        *devp = NULL;
        debug("%s: Searching for driver\n", __func__);
@@ -533,8 +563,8 @@ static int usb_find_and_bind_driver(struct udevice *parent, * find another driver. For now this doesn't seem
                         * necesssary, so just bind the first match.
                         */
- ret = device_bind(parent, drv, drv->name, NULL, -1,
-                                         &dev);
+ ret = device_bind_ofnode(parent, drv, drv->name, NULL,
+                                                node, &dev);
                        if (ret)
                                goto error;
debug("%s: Match found: %s\n", __func__, drv->name); @@ -651,9 +681,10 @@ int usb_scan_device(struct udevice *parent, int port,
        if (ret) {
                if (ret != -ENOENT)
                        return ret;
- ret = usb_find_and_bind_driver(parent, &udev->descriptor, iface, + ret = usb_find_and_bind_driver(parent, &udev->descriptor,
+                                              iface,
udev->controller_dev->seq,
-                                              udev->devnum, &dev);
+ udev->devnum, port, &dev);
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
                created = true;
--

Do we have tests added ?

Adding tests for this isn't straight forward. Mostly because the device tree is used to add the emulated USB devices. OTOH we try to match the device tree to the scanned devices. To make things worse, the hierarchy of the USB hubs
and usb devices doesn't seem to fit a "normal" device tree.

Eg. in sandbox/dts/test.dts it is:
usb@1 {
  /* this is the controller */
  hub {
    /* I don't know what this is */
    hub-emul {
      /* this is the root hub */
      flash-stick@0 {
        reg = <0>;
        /* this is an usb device on port _1_ of the root hub */
      };
    };
  };
};

On a real device tree (eg. the raspberry pi one) it is:
usb {
  /* this is the controller & root hub */
  usb1@1 {
    /* this is another _external_ hub on port 1 of the root hub */
    reg = <1>;
    usbether@1 {
      /* this is an usb device on port 1 of the external hub */
      reg = <1>;
    };
  };
};

They don't match at all. Thus the new code won't match any device
of the emulated usb hierarchy.

-michael

Reply via email to