Hi Bin, >-----Original Message----- >From: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> >Sent: 20 May 2020 19:15 >To: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> >Cc: Rick Chen <rickche...@gmail.com>; Jagan Teki ><ja...@amarulasolutions.com>; Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com>; U- >Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; rick <r...@andestech.com>; Alan >Kao <alan...@andestech.com> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL > >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you recognize the >sender and know the content is safe > >Hi Pragnesh, > >On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:52 PM Pragnesh Patel ><pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Bin, >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> >> >Sent: 20 May 2020 15:54 >> >To: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> >> >Cc: Rick Chen <rickche...@gmail.com>; Jagan Teki >> ><ja...@amarulasolutions.com>; Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com>; >U- >> >Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; rick <r...@andestech.com>; >> >Alan Kao <alan...@andestech.com> >> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL >> > >> >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you >> >recognize the sender and know the content is safe >> > >> >Hi Pragnesh, >> > >> >On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:41 PM Pragnesh Patel >> ><pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Bin, >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >> >From: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> >> >> >Sent: 20 May 2020 13:07 >> >> >To: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> >> >> >Cc: Rick Chen <rickche...@gmail.com>; Jagan Teki >> >> ><ja...@amarulasolutions.com>; Sean Anderson ><sean...@gmail.com>; >> >U- >> >> >Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; rick >> >> ><r...@andestech.com>; Alan Kao <alan...@andestech.com> >> >> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL >> >> > >> >> >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you >> >> >recognize the sender and know the content is safe >> >> > >> >> >"Hi Pragnesh, >> >> > >> >> >On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:29 PM Pragnesh Patel >> >> ><pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >> >> >From: Rick Chen <rickche...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >Sent: 20 May 2020 08:38 >> >> >> >To: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>; Pragnesh Patel >> >> >> ><pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com>; Jagan Teki >> >> >> ><ja...@amarulasolutions.com>; Sean Anderson >> ><sean...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; rick >> >> >> ><r...@andestech.com>; Alan Kao <alan...@andestech.com> >> >> >> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL >> >> >> > >> >> >> >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you >> >> >> >recognize the sender and know the content is safe >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Hi Bin >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> >> >> From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng...@gmail.com] >> >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 4:44 PM >> >> >> >> To: Pragnesh Patel; Rick Jian-Zhi Chen(陳建志) >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support >> >> >> >> SPL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Rick, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:04 PM Pragnesh Patel >> >> >> ><pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > This series add support for SPL to FU540. U-Boot SPL can >> >> >> >> > boot from >> >> >> >> > L2 LIM (0x0800_0000) and jump to OpenSBI(FW_DYNAMIC >> >firmware) >> >> >and >> >> >> >> > U-Boot proper from MMC devices. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > This series depends on: >> >> >> >> > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281853 >> >> >> >> > [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281852 >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > All these together is available for testing here [3] [3] >> >> >> >> > https://github.com/pragnesh26992/u-boot/tree/spl >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > How to test this patch: >> >> >> >> > 1) Go to OpenSBI-dir : make PLATFORM=generic >FW_DYNAMIC=y >> >> >> >> > 2) export >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>OPENSBI=<path/to/opensbi/build/platform/generic/firmware/fw_dynam >i >> >c. >> >> >> >> > bi >> >> >> >> > n> >> >> >> >> > 3) Change to u-boot-dir >> >> >> >> > 4) make sifive_fu540_defconfig >> >> >> >> > 5) make all >> >> >> >> > 6) Format the SD card (make sure the disk has GPT, >> >> >> >> > otherwise use gdisk to switch) >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > # sudo sgdisk --clear \ >> >> >> >> > > --set-alignment=2 \ >> >> >> >> > > --new=1:34:2081 --change-name=1:loader1 >> >> >> >> > --typecode=1:5B193300- >> >> >> >FC78-40CD-8002-E86C45580B47 \ >> >> >> >> > > --new=2:2082:10273 --change-name=2:loader2 -- >> >> >> >typecode=2:2E54B353-1271-4842-806F-E436D6AF6985 \ >> >> >> >> > > --new=3:10274: --change-name=3:rootfs >> >> >> >> > --typecode=3:0FC63DAF- >> >> >> >8483-4772-8E79-3D69D8477DE4 \ >> >> >> >> > > /dev/sda >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > 7) sudo dd if=spl/u-boot-spl.bin of=/dev/sda seek=34 >> >> >> >> > 8) sudo dd if=u-boot.itb of=/dev/sda seek=2082 >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Changes in v11: >> >> >> >> > - Remove TPL related code and OF_PLATDATA from FU540 >> >> >> >> > DDR driver (drivers/ram/sifive/fu540_ddr.c) >> >> >> >> > - Update FU540 doc (doc/board/sifive/fu540.rst) >> >> >> >> > Remove unnecessary print >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Could we get this v11 applied as soon as possible for v2020.07? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >No problem, if everything is OK, I will applied ASAP. >> >> >> >But Jagan seem have some responses, please check about it. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > This series depends on: >> >> >> >> > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281853 >> >> >> >> > [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281852 >> >> >> >> >> >> With " assigned-clocks" and " assigned-clock-rates" for cpus, >> >> >> this >> >> >> FU540 SPL series is no more depend on the above patches. >> >> >> >> >> >> cpus { >> >> >> assigned-clocks = <&prci PRCI_CLK_COREPLL>; >> >> >> assigned-clock-rates = <1000000000>; ..... >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> I will update the series dependency in v12. Thanks to @Sean >> >> >> Anderson for >> >> >the suggestion. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >Are these "assigned-clocks" and "assigned-clock-rates" bindings >> >> >the suggested ones by the Linux kernel upstream? >> >> >> >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200502100628.248 >> >> 09- >> >> 17-pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com/ >> > >> >I see. "assigned-clocks" is only needed for U-Boot. >> > >> >Do we still need "clocks" in each cpu node? >> >> Right now, "cpu detail" shows wrong frequency in U-Boot for FU540. >> This >https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200503024637.327733- >18-sean...@gmail.com/ patch solves that problem. >> >> For this patch, we need "clocks" in each cpu node. > >Thanks. So for SPL booting this series does not depend on Sean's patches, but >for "cpu detail" to show correct frequency, Sean's patches are still needed.
Ahhh, yes. > >Regards, >Bin
