On 4/1/20 3:45 PM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote: > Hi Marek, Hi,
>> From: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> >> Sent: jeudi 26 mars 2020 16:57 >> >> Define FMC2 base address, for use in board files, until there is an actual >> FMC2 >> bus driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> >> Cc: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delau...@st.com> >> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@st.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/stm32.h | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/stm32.h b/arch/arm/mach- >> stm32mp/include/mach/stm32.h >> index f0636005e5..62d95d7f88 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/stm32.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/stm32.h >> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ >> #define STM32_RCC_BASE 0x50000000 >> #define STM32_PWR_BASE 0x50001000 >> #define STM32_DBGMCU_BASE 0x50081000 >> +#define STM32_FMC2_BASE 0x58002000 > > For me, the address should be defined in this file only for the few addresses > used > before device tree avaibility: I want to avoid to have all the device defined > here. > > But normally it is not the case for FMC2, even if I understand the current > need, without FMC2 bus driver.... > I will take this patch only it is not possible to get FMC2 address from > device tree. I can parse this information from the DT, but what would be the benefit? Slower boot due to the need to traverse DT and more complex code?
