Hi Andy, On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:05, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 08:57:27PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 06:58, Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 05:12:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > This file is potentially useful to other architectures saddled with ACPI > > > > so move most of its contents to a common location. > > > > > > It's not just potentially, it's definitely useful. > > > But this makes me think, why we don't incorporate ACPICA headers as is? > > > > Due to code style and the vast amount of unused code. > > So, it will be interesting journey over the same problems then. > But it's your problem to maintain this :-)
If Intel is interested in maintaining this in U-Boot let us know. So long as the code style is right as we don't add dead code it should be fine. Regards, Simon
