On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 05:12:59PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> The current code uses an address but a pointer would result in fewer
> casts. Also it repeats the alignment code in a lot of places so this would
> be better done in a helper function.
> 
> Update write_acpi_tables() to make use of the new acpi_ctx structure,
> adding a few helpers to clean things up.

...

> +void acpi_align(struct acpi_ctx *ctx);

> +void acpi_align64(struct acpi_ctx *ctx);

In the code, it will be not understandable the difference.
align without number would be good if the function only single one.

So, align16() much better.

> +void acpi_inc(struct acpi_ctx *ctx, uint amount);

inc with amount is not inc, it's rather add.

> + * acpi_inc_align() - Increment the ACPI output pointer by a bit and align

Align how?

> +void acpi_inc_align(struct acpi_ctx *ctx, uint amount);

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Reply via email to