Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 13:30, Wolfgang Wallner
<wolfgang.wall...@br-automation.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> -----"Simon Glass" <s...@chromium.org> schrieb: -----
>
> >Betreff: [PATCH v3 19/29] acpi: Add a central location for table
> >version numbers
> >
> >Each ACPI table has its own version number. Add the version numbers
> >in a
> >single function so we can keep them consistent and easily see what
> >versions are supported.
> >
> >Start a new acpi_table file in a generic directory to house this
> >function.
> >We can move things over to this file from x86 as needed.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> >---
> >
> >Changes in v3:
> >- Fix a few typos
> >- Fix file comment for acpi_table.c
> >
> >Changes in v2:
> >- Move the sandbox acpi_table.h header file to an earlier patch
> >- Use #defines for MADT and MCFG version numbers
> >
> > include/acpi/acpi_table.h | 61
> >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/Makefile | 1 +
> > lib/acpi/Makefile | 4 +++
> > lib/acpi/acpi_table.c | 60
> >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > test/dm/acpi.c | 14 +++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 lib/acpi/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 lib/acpi/acpi_table.c
> >
> >diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_table.h b/include/acpi/acpi_table.h
> >index dd748958136..ccf6fa04dbe 100644
> >--- a/include/acpi/acpi_table.h
> >+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_table.h
> >@@ -202,6 +202,26 @@ struct __packed acpi_fadt {
> > struct acpi_gen_regaddr x_gpe1_blk;
> > };
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> > #include <asm/acpi_table.h>
> >diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> >index 15259d0473c..f737eb559fc 100644
> >--- a/lib/Makefile
> >+++ b/lib/Makefile
> >@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> >
> > ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> >
> >+obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)ACPIGEN) += acpi/
>
> Could you please help me understand why $(SPL_) is used here?
> You have mentioned in your answer of the v2 patch explicitly that you should
> use $SPL_ here and have changed the patch accordingly in v3, so I trust that
> it makes sense. But I fail to understand how this works. The newly added line
> is within "ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD", in which case $SPL_ should alwys be empty
> anyway. At least that is how I understood the assigment to SPL_ in
> Makefile.spl.
Yes you are right. It is unnecessary. I'll move it down further.
>
> > obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_LOADER) += efi_driver/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_LOADER) += efi_loader/
>
> [snip]
>
> Reviewed-by: Wolfgang Wallner <wolfgang.wall...@br-automation.com>
