Hi Reinhard On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, Reinhard Meyer <u-b...@emk-elektronik.de> wrote: > Hallo, > > macb.c is known to work for AT91 and AVR32. > > Why was at91_emac.c introduced into mainstream? > > By name it suggests it is designed to work with AT91 (only)? > > I don't think it is desireable to have to drivers doing the same task. > > Unless someone has a good point why we need at91_emac.c I propose to > remove it from mainstream. > If they really are for the same hardware block, then I agree. For this, though, you'll need to get many testers and 'Acked-by's. > Best Regards, > Reinhard > Regards, Ben
> _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
