Hallo, macb.c is known to work for AT91 and AVR32.
Why was at91_emac.c introduced into mainstream? By name it suggests it is designed to work with AT91 (only)? I don't think it is desireable to have to drivers doing the same task. Unless someone has a good point why we need at91_emac.c I propose to remove it from mainstream. Best Regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
