Dear =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Matthias_Wei=DFer?=, In message <4c5aab4c.9010...@arcor.de> you wrote: > > As my board is not mainlined (still waiting for any review on V5) this > doesn't make sense from my point of view.
I just sent a few reviews to one of the patches. As soon as you resubmit this patch, I'll pull the stuff into u-boot-arm and then into mainline. > Here are some numbers: > > Test: old (icache) new (i+d cache) > image size 191k 204k x 1.06 > copy 32MB NOR -> RAM 7.0s 6.5s x 1.07 > iminfo of 1.2MiB image 0.5s 0.1s x 5.0 > bootm of 1.2MiB gz image 5.4s 0.5s x 10.8 > bootm of 0.8MiB lzma image 17.1s 1.5s x 11.4 > bootm of 1.6MiB lzo image 3.2s 0.2s x 16.0 > > The three images have all the same payload. Just tested the three > different compression methods. > > Boot time limit into application code is 5s so u-boot image compression > was not an option. But now it is. Indeed - that's an impressive set of results. Thanks for the testing. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by stupidity. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
