Hi Jagan, On 09.01.20 14:59, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 5:04 PM Wadim Egorov <w.ego...@phytec.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 07.01.20 10:59, Kever Yang wrote: >>> Add Wadim in cc, >>> >>> Hi Jagan, >>> >>> After this patch set apply, the phycore-rk3288 board's SPL size is >>> overflow: >>> >>> arm: + phycore-rk3288 >>> +Error: SPL image is too large (size 0x9000 than 0x8000) >>> +Error: Bad parameters for image type >>> >>> Maybe we need to enable the TPL for this board? @Wadim >> I would like it to keep the SPL for the phyCORE board. In this thread >> [1] I pointed out that you can drop the phycore_init() function that was >> sometimes blowing up the size of the phyCORE SPL image. So if there is >> no new other feature that increases the SPL size, we can just remove the >> code and the SPL should fit again. If you like I can take a look at this >> next week. > This won't help much, but one possibility is to use SPL_OF_PLATDATA > (I've verified). Can you help us to try as quickly as possible? or do > you want us to try?
Or we can simply disable CONFIG_SPL_I2C_SUPPORT and CONFIG_SPL_POWER_SUPPORT in the phycore-rk3288_defconfig. What do you want me to do now? Testing your patches with SPL_OF_PLATDATA=y on our board? If so, I can help you next week with testing.
