On May 27, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <7d2ba6a1-2eef-4bf5-8b76-07ad55537...@kernel.crashing.org> you > wrote: >> >>> i. e. the highest number is at the lowest address?? >> >> Correct, that is matching FSL HW docs numbering/naming. >> >> in the .dts the alias: >> * "pci0" is @ 0x8000 - FSL HW calls it PCIE3 >> * "pci1" is @ 0x9000 - FSL HW calls it PCIE2 >> * "pci2" is @ 0xa000 - FSL HW calls it PCIE1 > > IMHO there were several decisions that I would not exactly call > intelligent - the first to assign HW names in descending order, and > the second to chose a different order for the bus names. > > Now we sit here and have to suffer from this :-(
Agree on both fronts. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
