Dear Kumar Gala, In message <7d2ba6a1-2eef-4bf5-8b76-07ad55537...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > > > i. e. the highest number is at the lowest address?? > > Correct, that is matching FSL HW docs numbering/naming. > > in the .dts the alias: > * "pci0" is @ 0x8000 - FSL HW calls it PCIE3 > * "pci1" is @ 0x9000 - FSL HW calls it PCIE2 > * "pci2" is @ 0xa000 - FSL HW calls it PCIE1
IMHO there were several decisions that I would not exactly call intelligent - the first to assign HW names in descending order, and the second to chose a different order for the bus names. Now we sit here and have to suffer from this :-( Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies and the other is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious defi- ciencies. - Charles Anthony Richard Hoare _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
