Wolfgang Denk wrote: > 799.992 MHz seems to be 24 * 33,333,000 Hz. Are you sure this is the > exact quartz frequency on your board? If yes, then the number printed > should probably remain 799.992 MHz. Or is it 33,333,333 Hz? Or > 33,000,000 ?
Ok, I see your point. Technically, I am returning a less precise number. However, the current code adds a 1 to the result, which is definitely wrong. On my board, for example, it returns 99999001, which is not correct. So the existing "rounding" algorithm is broken. However, I believe that displaying 799.999 MHz instead of 800 MHz is silly. The problem is that strmhz() rounds to the nearest KHz. I wonder if that's really useful. Perhaps we should make it act more like print_size(), where it prints KHz, MHz, or GHz as appropriate, and rounds to the nearest 10th, instead of 1000th. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot