Dear Timur Tabi,

In message <aanlktilji5knon3qd_58dy7xpegviiibe1qy0gxoq...@mail.gmail.com> you 
wrote:
> 
> So here's a better version of that function that rounds to the nearest
> MHz and is of a proper coding style:

Why do we need that?

> And the result:
>
> Clock Configuration:
>        CPU0:800  MHz, CPU1:800  MHz,
>        CCB:400  MHz,
>        DDR:300  MHz (600 MT/s data rate) (Asynchronous), LBC:25   MHz

The result looks ugly (why do we have double spaces after the
numbers?, why do the numbers not align vertically?).

This makes me wonder why you use a "%-4s" format in
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8?xx/cpu.c - may I recommend changing this into
"%s" (if you don't care about vertical alignment), or something like
"%4s" else?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
It is surely a great calamity for  a  human  being  to  have  no  ob-
sessions.                                                - Robert Bly
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to