Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Why would this in any way be a board specific implementation? This > makes no sense to me. The feature to include some binary data into the > DTB is IMO in no way dependent on or specific to a certain board.
The data I'm trying to embed is firmware for various devices on some of our SOCs, such as the QE on the MPC8360. Only boards with SOCs that have these devices come with firmware, and not all of them require the firmware to be passed to Linux. Please note that fdt_increase_size() is just a front-end to fdt_open_into(), so technically I don't need to fdt_increase_size(). However, you said you would reject any patch that uses fdt_open_into() in this manner, so we're back to square one. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
