On 4/23/19 11:33 AM, Wadim Egorov wrote: > Hi, > > On 19.04.19 17:20, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 4/19/19 5:06 PM, Parthiban Nallathambi wrote: >>> Hello Marek, >>> >>> On 4/19/19 3:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> On 4/19/19 3:18 PM, Parthiban Nallathambi wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig >>>>>>> index d29f1ca0b5..9336439340 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig >>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig >>>>>>> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ source "board/ti/am43xx/Kconfig" >>>>>>> source "board/ti/am335x/Kconfig" >>>>>>> source "board/compulab/cm_t335/Kconfig" >>>>>>> source "board/compulab/cm_t43/Kconfig" >>>>>>> +source "board/phytec/phycore_pcl060/Kconfig" >>>>>> Here [1] it says the name of the SoM is PCM-060 , what is PCL-060 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> https://www.phytec.eu/product-eu/system-on-modules/phycore-am335x-download/ >>>>>> [...] >>>>> This differs only by the connector. PCM variants are pluggable and PCL >>>>> variants >>>>> are direct soliderable to the carrier board. >>>>> >>>>> Copied from [1]: >>>>> The PCL-060 System On Module is a connector-less, BGA style variant of the >>>>> PCM-060/phyCORE-AM335x R2 SOM. Unlike traditional Phytec SOM products >>>>> that support >>>>> high density connectors, the PCL-060 SOM is directly soldered down to the >>>>> phyBOARD-Wega AM335x using Phytec's Direct Solder Connect technology >>>>> (DSC). This >>>>> solution offers an ultra-low cost Single Board Computer for the AM335x >>>>> processor, while >>>>> maintaining most of the advantages of the SOM concept. >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://www.phytec.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/Manuals/L-845e_1.pdf >>>> Ah damn, this looks like a consistency problem is coming up. We have >>>> multiple PCM* SoMs in U-Boot, one PCL* SoM and now another PCL/PCM SoM. >>>> But the PCL063 isn't even manufactured in variant with connectors, so I >>>> guess we can ignore that one. >>>> >>>> I wonder whether we should stick to PCM* for all of the Phytec SoMs for >>>> consistency sake and document that PCL060 is also supported or maybe >>>> there's a better way ? >>> Does PCX/PCx makes sense? But we have the same problem with variscite [1] >>> SoM's >>> (either SODIMM or solderable). >>> >>> [1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-April/365667.html >> PCX would introduce another option, in addition to PCM/PCL, one which >> cannot be easily found on the internet, so I'd like to avoid that. I >> am banking toward the sticking with PCM where possible (simply because >> that's what $searchengine spits out first when you look for that SoM, >> and because we already have plenty of PCM-nnn SoMs), but maybe someone >> has a better idea . > > why not simply use the full name of the module instead? > > - phyCORE-AM335x > - phyCORE-AM335x R2 > > I did the same for the phyCORE-RK3288.
Well, that's fine by me, and I think it's better than the pcm060 or pcl060 too. Let's go with this, unless there are objections. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
