On 3/4/19 3:19 PM, Ismael Luceno Cortes wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <ismael.luc...@silicon-gears.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/rcar_i2c.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/rcar_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/rcar_i2c.c
> index b4cc0c55b1..5e04b68d95 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/rcar_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/rcar_i2c.c
> @@ -144,10 +144,6 @@ static int rcar_i2c_read_common(struct udevice *dev,
> struct i2c_msg *msg)
> u32 icmcr = RCAR_I2C_ICMCR_MDBS | RCAR_I2C_ICMCR_MIE;
> int i, ret = -EREMOTEIO;
>
> - ret = rcar_i2c_set_addr(dev, msg->addr, 1);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> for (i = 0; i < msg->len; i++) {
> if (msg->len - 1 == i)
> icmcr |= RCAR_I2C_ICMCR_FSB;
> @@ -174,10 +170,6 @@ static int rcar_i2c_write_common(struct udevice *dev,
> struct i2c_msg *msg)
> u32 icmcr = RCAR_I2C_ICMCR_MDBS | RCAR_I2C_ICMCR_MIE;
> int i, ret = -EREMOTEIO;
>
> - ret = rcar_i2c_set_addr(dev, msg->addr, 0);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> for (i = 0; i < msg->len; i++) {
> writel(msg->buf[i], priv->base + RCAR_I2C_ICRXD_ICTXD);
> writel(icmcr, priv->base + RCAR_I2C_ICMCR);
> @@ -201,6 +193,10 @@ static int rcar_i2c_xfer(struct udevice *dev, struct
> i2c_msg *msg, int nmsgs)
> int ret;
>
> for (; nmsgs > 0; nmsgs--, msg++) {
> + ret = rcar_i2c_set_addr(dev, msg->addr, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + return -EREMOTEIO;
Shouldn't you return ret here ? It seems like you fixed similar issue in
4/6.
> +
> if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
> ret = rcar_i2c_read_common(dev, msg);
> else
> @@ -210,7 +206,7 @@ static int rcar_i2c_xfer(struct udevice *dev, struct
> i2c_msg *msg, int nmsgs)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
Is this change valid ?
> }
>
> static int rcar_i2c_probe_chip(struct udevice *dev, uint addr, uint flags)
>
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
