On 1/3/19 6:36 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote: > On Tue, 2019-01-01 at 21:29 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 1/1/19 4:32 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 2018-12-30 at 16:47 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/30/18 9:13 AM, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.c...@intel.com> >>>>> >>>>> Update the default configuration file to enable the necessary >>>>> functionality >>>>> to get the SoCFPGA loadfs driver support. This would enable the >>>>> implementation of programming bitstream into FPGA from MMC. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.c...@intel.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> configs/socfpga_arria10_defconfig | 8 ++++++++ >>>>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/configs/socfpga_arria10_defconfig >>>>> b/configs/socfpga_arria10_defconfig >>>>> index 6ebda81..8158dbb 100644 >>>>> --- a/configs/socfpga_arria10_defconfig >>>>> +++ b/configs/socfpga_arria10_defconfig >>>>> @@ -27,8 +27,16 @@ CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nor0=ff705000.spi.0" >>>>> # CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION is not set >>>>> CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="socfpga_arria10_socdk_sdmmc" >>>>> CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC=y >>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_ENV_SUPPORT=y >>>>> CONFIG_SPL_DM=y >>>>> CONFIG_SPL_DM_SEQ_ALIAS=y >>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_DM_MMC=y >>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT=y >>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_EXT_SUPPORT=y >>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT=y >>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_DRIVERS_MISC_SUPPORT=y >>>>> +CONFIG_FS_FAT_MAX_CLUSTSIZE=16384 >>>> This breaks systems with large FAT clusters. Why is this needed >>>> for >>>> programming the FPGA from MMC ? >>> This is final tuning in term of getting balance between performance >>> and >>> SPL image size for the socdk devkit. User can change that if they >>> need >>> large FAT cluster in their design, right? >> I think it'd rather make sense to fix the FAT driver to avoid >> statically >> allocating those massive buffers for big clusters. I think that can >> be >> done by allocating those on stack instead ... or mallocating them. > I need to explore 1st as i'm not familiar with FAT driver. Or can we > temporary keeping this patch 1st until FAT issue is separately fixed?
Please explore this, it'll be beneficial in the long run. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot