Heinrich, On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 07:19:58PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 10/09/2018 09:24 AM, AKASHI, Takahiro wrote: > > Do you have any specific idea about what is really missing > > in Leif's/Rob's HII patch? > > (My original question.) > > > > -Takahiro Akashi > > Please, see https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/823807/
Thanks, I didn't notice this thread. > Open topics were: > - usage of bitfields > - incorrect determination of string lengths > - too deep nesting of of loops and ifs Okay, those seem to be easily fixable at a glance. > - incomplete implementation of the protocols That is a matter I'm concerned about. There's no consensus yet about what should be in an "initial" port. BTW, you said there were some missing protocols to run i386 version of Shell: EFI HII font protocol and EFI HII Image protocol. Do you still believe so even after Alex's comment? Thanks, -Takahiro Akashi > As other protocols are based on the HII database protocol we should > start with this protocol in a separate patch. We should have a unit test > in lib/efi_selftest/ for all methods of the protocol. > > Best regards > > Heinrich _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot