Hi Simon, On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:41 AM Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi Bin, > > On 8 October 2018 at 02:54, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:36 PM Zhiqiang Hou <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> wrote: > >> > >> From: Hou Zhiqiang <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> > >> > >> As the PCIe specification recommend reading the Vendor ID register > >> to determine if a Function is present, read the Vendor ID of a > >> non-existent Function must not result in system error, so we'd better > >> make the first CFG read to Vendor ID instead of Header Type register > >> in the PCIe enumeration. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/pci/pci.c | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > > > > Simon, do we need fix the non-DM version or adding new "capability" to > > the non-DM drivers? I guess the answer is no and we should set some > > deadline for PCI DM conversion too? > > We should not fix or add new features to non-DM PCI. No one should be > using it at this point. > > I agree about the deadline. Do you want to send a patch? >
Actually I am not sure how to send a patch for such kind of deadline stuff :-) Please go ahead. Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
