Hi Bin, On 8 October 2018 at 02:54, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:36 PM Zhiqiang Hou <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> wrote: >> >> From: Hou Zhiqiang <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> >> >> As the PCIe specification recommend reading the Vendor ID register >> to determine if a Function is present, read the Vendor ID of a >> non-existent Function must not result in system error, so we'd better >> make the first CFG read to Vendor ID instead of Header Type register >> in the PCIe enumeration. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> >> --- >> drivers/pci/pci.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > > Simon, do we need fix the non-DM version or adding new "capability" to > the non-DM drivers? I guess the answer is no and we should set some > deadline for PCI DM conversion too?
We should not fix or add new features to non-DM PCI. No one should be using it at this point. I agree about the deadline. Do you want to send a patch? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
