> -----Original Message----- > From: Horia Geanta > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 8:03 PM > To: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com>; Bharat Bhushan > <bharat.bhus...@nxp.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prabhakar Kushwaha > <prabhakar.kushw...@nxp.com>; York Sun <york....@nxp.com> > Cc: Alison Wang <alison.w...@nxp.com>; Ruchika Gupta > <ruchika.gu...@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] armv8: ls1046a: setup SEC ICIDs and fix up device > tree > > On 7/30/2018 4:58 PM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > >> The only way to implement a *mechanism* is to provide different ICIDs > >> for all the blocks. > >> Any other solution would be imposing a *policy*, thus restricting > >> user's possibilities. Admittedly there are use cases less "popular" > >> than others, but if possible it would be best not to decide for the user > >> and > provide full flexibility. > >> > >> Is there a resource (ICID values) shortage? > >> > > No. I can change the patch to have distinct ICIDs and resubmit. Please > > let me know if you agree on this.
Yes, please assign separate ICIDs for each. Thanks -Bharat > > > Yes, this is my suggestion. > IIUC it's also similar to the way LIODNs are allocated on PPC. > True, LS102x is the exception - it assigns ICID 0x10 to all SEC blocks. > > Regards, > Horia _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
