Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > Hello Tom, > > Tom wrote: >> Jens Scharsig wrote: >>> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs >>> This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access >>> to c structures. If CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY is defined, the deprecated >>> SoC is used. >>> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig <js_at...@scharsoft.de> >> This looks good. >> The only problem is the new at91 target otc570 is breaking. >> >> Please take a look at errors in otc570 >> >> otc570 : >> >> at91sam9263_devices.c: In function 'at91_serial0_hw_init': >> at91sam9263_devices.c:40: warning: implicit declaration of function >> 'at91_set_a_periph' >> at91sam9263_devices.c: In function 'at91_spi0_hw_init': >> at91sam9263_devices.c:96: warning: implicit declaration of function >> 'at91_set_b_periph' >> at91sam9263_devices.c:116: warning: implicit declaration of function >> 'at91_set_pio_output' >> clock.c: In function 'at91_clock_init': >> clock.c:160: warning: implicit declaration of function 'at91_sys_read' >> clock.c:160: error: 'AT91_CKGR_MCFR' undeclared (first use in this function) >> clock.c:160: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once >> clock.c:160: error: for each function it appears in.) >> >> Tom > > This is caused by missing defines in include\configs\otc570.h: > #define CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY > and > #define CONFIG_AT91_GPIO 1 > > Should I send a patch to fix this, or should I wait for Jens patches coming > mainline? >
Please send a patch. It should be a 2-3 liner. I will combine it with Jens' patchset and push them together. Tom > Best regards, > Daniel Gorsulowski _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
