Hi Alex, On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:51:57 +0200 Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote:
> On 20.04.18 12:03, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: > > The magic value that disables relocation is dependent on the CPU word > > size, so the current 'ffffffff' is doing the wrong thing on aarch64. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuo...@tuxera.com> > > The BCM283x series of SOCs is limited to 32bit address space, so I don't > quite see why the current (int)-1 is wrong? > > The comparison for the magic "don't relocate value" is done by parsing the variable as ulong and then comparing to ~0. So on 64-bit, ffffffff gets interpreted as literal 0xffffffff limit for the relocation (which I think in practice is the same as not specifying initrd_high at all since the end of DRAM is lower than that) instead. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
