Hi Simon, On Wed, 16 May 2018 02:04:58 +1000, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Miquel, > > On 15 May 2018 at 19:57, Miquel Raynal <miquel.ray...@bootlin.com> wrote: > > Add the tpm2_tis_spi driver that should support any TPMv2 compliant > > (SPI) module. > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.ray...@bootlin.com> > > --- > > drivers/tpm/Kconfig | 10 + > > drivers/tpm/Makefile | 2 + > > drivers/tpm/tpm2_tis_spi.c | 664 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 676 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/tpm/tpm2_tis_spi.c > > > > Is there a change log for this patch? Yes there is one in the cover letter but your are right it was not clear enough what file I was talking about: <snip> > * Removed useless reset of rx_buf[0] in tpm_tis_spi_xfer(). > * Changed the way spi_xfer return code is checked: error out on any > value != 0 instead of just negative ones. > * Removed unused functions flagged __maybe_unused as well as well as the > __maybe_unused flags themselves when not needed. > * Simplified the validity check of the GPIO as suggested. > * Updated the compatible property for the SPI modules (as well as the > bindings docuementation) to be simply "tis,tpm2-spi" which should work > with most compliant chips. Data is linked to this generic compatible > in the TPM driver, other values may be added if needed in the future > to fit other chips that would use different values than the current > ones (used by Infineon SLB 9670 and ST ST33TPHF20 modules, for > instance). </snip> Regards, Miquèl -- Miquel Raynal, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
