As per the IFC hardware manual, Most significant byte in nand_fsr register is the outcome of NAND READ STATUS command.
So status value need to be shifted as per the nand framework requirement. Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya <jagdish.ged...@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushw...@nxp.com> --- Changes for v2: - Change the waitfunc return value according to semantic enforced by framework. Changes for v3: - Change commit message as per York's suggestion. drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c index c36043d..9bf4d71 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c @@ -701,6 +701,7 @@ static int fsl_ifc_wait(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip) struct fsl_ifc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl; struct fsl_ifc_runtime *ifc = ctrl->regs.rregs; u32 nand_fsr; + int status; if (ctrl->status != IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_OPC) return NAND_STATUS_FAIL; @@ -721,10 +722,10 @@ static int fsl_ifc_wait(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip) return NAND_STATUS_FAIL; nand_fsr = ifc_in32(&ifc->ifc_nand.nand_fsr); + status = nand_fsr >> 24; /* Chip sometimes reporting write protect even when it's not */ - nand_fsr = nand_fsr | NAND_STATUS_WP; - return nand_fsr; + return status | NAND_STATUS_WP; } static int fsl_ifc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot