On 27.04.2018 09:31, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> On 11/04/2018 18:04, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> From: Stefan Agner <stefan.ag...@toradex.com>
>>
>> Add support for minimum ECC strength supported by the NAND chip.
>> This aligns with the behavior when using the fsl,use-minimum-ecc
>> device tree property in Linux.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.ag...@toradex.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v3: None
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig    |  8 +++++
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
>> index 4db259fcb2..c039b9cc60 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
>> @@ -152,6 +152,14 @@ config NAND_MXS
>>        This enables NAND driver for the NAND flash controller on the
>>        MXS processors.
>>
>> +if NAND_MXS
>> +
>> +config NAND_MXS_USE_MINIMUM_ECC
>> +    bool "Use minimum ECC strength supported by the controller"
>> +    default false
>> +
>> +endif
>> +
>>  config NAND_ZYNQ
>>      bool "Support for Zynq Nand controller"
>>      select SYS_NAND_SELF_INIT
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
>> index 2696b543ef..8305bf2302 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
>> @@ -211,11 +211,52 @@ static inline int mxs_nand_calc_mark_offset(struct 
>> bch_geometry *geo,
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> +static inline unsigned int mxs_nand_max_ecc_strength_supported(void)
>> +{
>> +    /* Refer to Chapter 17 for i.MX6DQ, Chapter 18 for i.MX6SX */
>> +    if (is_mx6sx() || is_mx7())
>> +            return 62;
>> +    else
>> +            return 40;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int mxs_nand_calc_ecc_layout_by_info(struct bch_geometry *geo,
>> +                                               struct mtd_info *mtd)
>> +{
>> +    struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>> +
>> +    if (!(chip->ecc_strength_ds > 0 && chip->ecc_step_ds > 0))
>> +            return -ENOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +    switch (chip->ecc_step_ds) {
>> +    case SZ_512:
>> +            geo->gf_len = 13;
>> +            break;
>> +    case SZ_1K:
>> +            geo->gf_len = 14;
>> +            break;
>> +    default:
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    geo->ecc_chunk_size = chip->ecc_step_ds;
>> +    geo->ecc_strength = round_up(chip->ecc_strength_ds, 2);
>> +
>> +    /* Keep the C >= O */
>> +    if (geo->ecc_chunk_size < mtd->oobsize)
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (geo->ecc_strength > mxs_nand_max_ecc_strength_supported())
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    geo->ecc_chunk_count = mtd->writesize / geo->ecc_chunk_size;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static inline int mxs_nand_calc_ecc_layout(struct bch_geometry *geo,
>>                                         struct mtd_info *mtd)
>>  {
>> -    unsigned int max_ecc_strength_supported;
>> -
>>      /* The default for the length of Galois Field. */
>>      geo->gf_len = 13;
>>
>> @@ -235,12 +276,6 @@ static inline int mxs_nand_calc_ecc_layout(struct 
>> bch_geometry *geo,
>>
>>      geo->ecc_chunk_count = mtd->writesize / geo->ecc_chunk_size;
>>
>> -    /* Refer to Chapter 17 for i.MX6DQ, Chapter 18 for i.MX6SX */
>> -    if (is_mx6sx() || is_mx7())
>> -            max_ecc_strength_supported = 62;
>> -    else
>> -            max_ecc_strength_supported = 40;
>> -
>>      /*
>>       * Determine the ECC layout with the formula:
>>       *      ECC bits per chunk = (total page spare data bits) /
>> @@ -252,10 +287,8 @@ static inline int mxs_nand_calc_ecc_layout(struct 
>> bch_geometry *geo,
>>      geo->ecc_strength = ((mtd->oobsize - MXS_NAND_METADATA_SIZE) * 8)
>>                      / (geo->gf_len * geo->ecc_chunk_count);
>>
>> -    geo->ecc_strength = min(round_down(geo->ecc_strength, 2), 
>> max_ecc_strength_supported);
>> -
>> -    if (mxs_nand_calc_mark_offset(geo, mtd->writesize) < 0)
>> -            return -EINVAL;
>> +    geo->ecc_strength = min(round_down(geo->ecc_strength, 2),
>> +                            mxs_nand_max_ecc_strength_supported());
>>
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -1006,9 +1039,19 @@ static int mxs_nand_setup_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>>      struct bch_geometry *geo = &nand_info->bch_geometry;
>>      struct mxs_bch_regs *bch_regs = (struct mxs_bch_regs *)MXS_BCH_BASE;
>>      uint32_t tmp;
>> +    int ret = -ENOTSUPP;
>>
>> -    if (mxs_nand_calc_ecc_layout(geo, mtd))
>> -            return -EINVAL;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_MXS_USE_MINIMUM_ECC
>> +    ret = mxs_nand_calc_ecc_layout_by_info(geo, mtd);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +    if (ret == -ENOTSUPP)
>> +            ret = mxs_nand_calc_ecc_layout(geo, mtd);
>> +
>> +    if (ret)
>> +            return ret;
>> +
>> +    mxs_nand_calc_mark_offset(geo, mtd->writesize);
>>
>>      /* Configure BCH and set NFC geometry */
>>      mxs_reset_block(&bch_regs->hw_bch_ctrl_reg);
>>
> 
> This is not completely clear to me - is this series replaced by :
> 
>       http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/902010/

No, the other patch set is on-top of this work.

With this patch set I already introduce minimum ECC, but by just using a
config symbol. The other patchset allows to enable the same using the
device tree property.

I guess the config symbol is still useful for non-dt platforms or SPLs.

--
Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to