Hi, On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> wrote: > Regarding the whole forward/backward compatibility: > I clearly see the difficulty in coming up with a "perfect" DT from day > one, especially for badly documented SoCs, where mainlining is driven by > hobbyists. So I was wondering if we introduce a grace period, where we > declare the DT "unstable" or "subject to incompatible changes" for some > releases (not too many). In hindsight we might declare 4.12 the stable > DT base for the A64, for instance. > This would allow us to start upstreaming early, with a small feature set > only (just serial + clocks + pinctrl, as for the H6). Additional > features (PMIC) might then add small incompatibilities (like this one > here), until we are reasonably confident about the DT. > Does that sound useful?
Kind of "staging" for DT ? -- Vincent Legoll _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
