Not sure, I have not had access to the original freescale authored kernel driver for sometime so I'm not sure what info is embedded there.
My naming came from the Redboot sources which were authored by Freescaler's. Also the numbering is consistent with what I recall from my days there. Perhaps someone still at Freescale and in the i.mx group will chime in. Fred? John On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:49:30AM -0700, John Rigby wrote: >> Ok, I now understand your suggestion. I still think the kernel naming >> is confusing since it does not match internal Freescale naming, but of >> course that only exists in Redboot source so I suppose it does not >> matter. > > I'd like to see it called what Freescale calls it. Besides helping to > correlate the driver with manuals, if there's to be any hope of one driver > for both ARM and PPC they'll need to agree on what to call it. > >> About your 5121 question, it is Freescale internal version 1.1 or >> using the kernel convention 2_1. > > Where did the kernel get 2.1 from if 1.1 is Freescale's name for it? > > -Scott > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
