On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:49:30AM -0700, John Rigby wrote: > Ok, I now understand your suggestion. I still think the kernel naming > is confusing since it does not match internal Freescale naming, but of > course that only exists in Redboot source so I suppose it does not > matter.
I'd like to see it called what Freescale calls it. Besides helping to correlate the driver with manuals, if there's to be any hope of one driver for both ARM and PPC they'll need to agree on what to call it. > About your 5121 question, it is Freescale internal version 1.1 or > using the kernel convention 2_1. Where did the kernel get 2.1 from if 1.1 is Freescale's name for it? -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
