On 01/03/2018 03:43 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
Stephen,

-----Original Message-----
From: s...@google.com [mailto:s...@google.com] On Behalf Of Simon Glass
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 8:14 PM
To: Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Tom Warren <twar...@nvidia.com>; Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>; U-Boot Mailing List 
<u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: tegra: don't use CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE when no SPL

On 19 December 2017 at 18:30, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>

64-bit Tegra don't use SPL, and soon won't define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE
when building. Fix the binman .dts file so that it doesn't use
undefined values.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
---
  arch/arm/dts/tegra-u-boot.dtsi | 15 +++++++++------
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>

I've applied this series to u-boot-tegra/master.  I'll wait a bit to see how 
your new series (RAM bank/mem parsing) is received and then I'll apply it, too, 
and post a PR.
I assume you expect the Linux kernel image header patches to go in thru TomR?

I think it's best to push them all through the Tegra path, since there will be a stream of common and Tegra patches all intermixed.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to