Dear Heinrich, In message <55e69128-b30c-78af-7e96-3aba873df...@gmx.de> you wrote: > > to cut it short, would you prefer > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/840912/ > > or > > https://github.com/xypron/u-boot-odroid-c2/blob/qemu-x86_64/patch/0001-vsprintf.c-add-EFI-device-path-printing.patch
Urgh. I really hate such external references. IIUC, then [2] has as only difference an additional early return in printf(). The only effect of this is to skip the "puts(printbuffer);". I can't say if this is worth the effort. In any case, you introduce inconsistent behaviour here. If you do it in printf(), it should (at least) also be done in vprintf() [and probably one should check the *snprintf() functions, too]. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
