On 8.11.2017 03:54, Wilson Lee wrote: > Initial platform creation for NIZYNQ. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com> > Signed-off-by: Keng Soon Cheah <keng.soon.ch...@ni.com> > Signed-off-by: Wilson Lee <wilson....@ni.com> > Cc: Chen Yee Chew <chen.yee.c...@ni.com> > Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> > --- > arch/arm/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/Makefile | 4 +++- > board/ni/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 board/ni/Kconfig > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > index 83b7aa5..ae34821 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > @@ -767,6 +767,20 @@ config ARCH_ZYNQMP > select DM_USB if USB > imply FAT_WRITE > > +config NIZYNQ > + bool "National Instruments zynq Platform" > + select CPU_V7 > + select SUPPORT_SPL > + select OF_CONTROL > + select SPL_OF_CONTROL if SPL > + select DM > + select DM_ETH > + select DM_GPIO > + select SPL_DM if SPL > + select DM_MMC > + select DM_SERIAL > + select SPL_SEPARATE_BSS if SPL > +
What's the reason for this? You should reuse current ZYNQ fragment and if this selects something what you don't want then we should change that. Look at syzygy or topic boards which are using existing zynq infrastructure. Thanks, Michal
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
