Dear Wolfgang Am Samstag, den 12.08.2017, 20:29 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Denk: > Dear Max, > > In message <20170812090346.7887-2-max.krummenac...@toradex.com> you wrote: > > > > Different SoCs have different RAM layouts, so providing > > $(CONFIG_LOADADDR) instead of the constant 0xc100000 for > > CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR is probably more appropriate. > > At least the wording of the Subject should be fixed.
Ok, will do. The issue is that linking the standalone application to have its text segment at a hardcoded address is less likely to work than using an address provided by the board configuration as a possible load address. Will reword the commit message in a v2 series accordingly. Max > > It is fundamentaaly broken to associate the names "loadaddr" and > "entry point" with each other. Both are completely independent > entities which mean totally different things. It is pure chance if > the entry point of some loaded image should be at the very beginning > of this image, but this is almost never the case. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
