Hi Michal, On 13 July 2017 at 06:50, Michal Simek <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <[email protected]> > > Make reserve_mmu a weak so that it provides an option > to customize this routine as per platform need
Why do you need this? Can we instead have the generic code do the right thing? Or can we use reserve_arch() to handle this? > > Signed-off-by: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]> > --- > > common/board_f.c | 2 +- > include/common.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/common/board_f.c b/common/board_f.c > index 2cdd12a503ae..09f0fbfb6c96 100644 > --- a/common/board_f.c > +++ b/common/board_f.c > @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int reserve_round_4k(void) > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM > -static int reserve_mmu(void) > +__weak int reserve_mmu(void) > { > #if !(defined(CONFIG_SYS_ICACHE_OFF) && defined(CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF)) > /* reserve TLB table */ > diff --git a/include/common.h b/include/common.h > index 1a98512ab618..ce4c92015928 100644 > --- a/include/common.h > +++ b/include/common.h > @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ void board_show_dram(phys_size_t size); > */ > int arch_fixup_fdt(void *blob); > > +int reserve_mmu(void); > /* common/flash.c */ > void flash_perror (int); > > -- > 1.9.1 > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
