Nishanth Menon wrote: >> + >> +#define WRITE_NAND_COMMAND(d, adr)\ >> + writel(d, &nand_cs_base->nand_cmd) > writel? i thought u had 16 bit nand device. > >> +#define WRITE_NAND_ADDRESS(d, adr)\ >> + writel(d, &nand_cs_base->nand_adr) >> +#define WRITE_NAND(d, adr) writew(d, &nand_cs_base->nand_dat) >> +#define READ_NAND(adr) readl(&nand_cs_base->nand_dat) > readl?? should'nt you be using readw? > > Why these functions? does'nt mtd layer handle this? look at beagle -> > it does not use that.. > >> + >> +/* Other NAND Access APIs */ >> +#define NAND_WP_OFF() do {readl(&gpmc_cfg_base->config) |= GPMC_CONFIG_WP; >> } \ >> + while (0) >> +#define NAND_WP_ON() do {readl(&gpmc_cfg_base->config) &= ~GPMC_CONFIG_WP; >> } \ >> + while (0) >> +#define NAND_DISABLE_CE(nand) >> +#define NAND_ENABLE_CE(nand) >> +#define NAND_WAIT_READY(nand) udelay(10) >> + > are these really needed?
No, they're not needed. That is the legacy NAND interface that has been superseded and removed. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot