On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:07:42AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > 于 2017年7月4日 GMT+08:00 上午4:46:17, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> 写到: > >On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 02:54:17PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> > >> > >> 于 2017年7月3日 GMT+08:00 下午2:52:00, Maxime Ripard > ><maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> 写到: > >> >On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 03:02:43PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> >> The Allwinner A83T SoC has an EMAC which is already supported by > >> >> sun8i_emac driver in U-Boot now. > >> >> > >> >> Add a stub device node for it. > >> >> > >> >> The device node cannot work for Linux, because it now lacks the > >> >proper > >> >> clock definition; however, it can satisfy sun8i_emac driver in > >> >U-Boot. > >> > > >> >Uh? > >> > > >> >There is clock support in Linux. > >> > >> But adding it will largely change U-Boot DT. > >> > >> I may do it then, in a sync between Linux and U-Boot DT. > > > >Why not send the patches to Linux, and just sync the DT later? > > The U-Boot DT have already changed from the Linux one for a lot.
Yes, and we had a good reason, the ethernet binding wasn't there yet. Fortunately, this isn't the case anymore, so there's no reason to diverge anymore. > Maybe I need to use the DT of at least 4.14... Merging something that is in linux-next is definitely ok. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
