Simon,

On 06/07/2017 05:10 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Pawel,

On 6 June 2017 at 12:51, Paweł Jarosz <paweljarosz3...@gmail.com> wrote:
rk3066 and rk3288 mmc designware ip's are very similiar. They differ in
internal dma support and max driver frequency.

Signed-off-by: Paweł Jarosz <paweljarosz3...@gmail.com>
---
  drivers/mmc/rockchip_dw_mmc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/rockchip_dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/rockchip_dw_mmc.c
index 25a21e2..d94c395 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/rockchip_dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/rockchip_dw_mmc.c
@@ -22,8 +22,14 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;

  struct rockchip_mmc_plat {
  #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3066
+       struct dtd_rockchip_rk2928_dw_mshc dtplat;
+#else
         struct dtd_rockchip_rk3288_dw_mshc dtplat;
  #endif
+
+#endif
         struct mmc_config cfg;
         struct mmc mmc;
  };
@@ -109,8 +115,11 @@ static int rockchip_dwmmc_probe(struct udevice *dev)
         int ret;

  #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA)
+#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3066
+       struct dtd_rockchip_rk2928_dw_mshc *dtplat = &plat->dtplat;
+#else
         struct dtd_rockchip_rk3288_dw_mshc *dtplat = &plat->dtplat;
-
+#endif
I am not keen on this - it will get ugly. Can you please do this:

Create a new driver for rk3288 which just has the platdata stuff,
rockchip_dwmmc_ofdata_to_platdata() and the U_BOOT_DRIVER().
Everything else should remain in this file.

Then in a new patch, create a driver for rk3066 which uses the same
common elements from rockchip_dw_mmc.c

I think I have discuss this with you online or offline  for many times,
when OF_PLATADATA enabled, the dts is pre-compile by dtoc and then
there is structure like 'dtd_rockchip_rk2928_dw_mshc' which is from the dts
node compatible name, I propose to use the last compatible name in dtoc
instead of the first one, then we can get the same structure name and used
in drivers.

I still not enable the dwmmc when OF_PLATDATA enabled on rk3399 because
of the same reason.

I think we should fix this from the root cause, but not make different driver
for different SoCs.

Thanks,
- Kever

         host->name = dev->name;
         host->ioaddr = map_sysmem(dtplat->reg[0], dtplat->reg[1]);
         host->buswidth = dtplat->bus_width;
@@ -118,7 +127,12 @@ static int rockchip_dwmmc_probe(struct udevice *dev)
         host->priv = dev;
         host->dev_index = 0;
         priv->fifo_depth = dtplat->fifo_depth;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3066
+       priv->fifo_mode = 1;
+#else
         priv->fifo_mode = 0;
+#endif
What about the fifo_mode property in the DT?

If you have to hard-code this you should use a .data parameter in
rockchip_dwmmc_ids (e.g. RK2928, RK3288) and use that to determine the
mode. But hopefully the DT is enough.

For OF_PLATDATA however I suggest you have a different probe() which
either sets up this value and then calls rockchip_dwmmc_probe(), or
add it as a parameter to rockchip_dwmmc_probe().

         memcpy(priv->minmax, dtplat->clock_freq_min_max, sizeof(priv->minmax));

         ret = clk_get_by_index_platdata(dev, 0, dtplat->clocks, &priv->clk);
@@ -162,14 +176,27 @@ static int rockchip_dwmmc_bind(struct udevice *dev)
  }

  static const struct udevice_id rockchip_dwmmc_ids[] = {
+       { .compatible = "rockchip,rk2928-dw-mshc" },
         { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc" },
         { }
  };

+U_BOOT_DRIVER(rockchip_rk2928_dw_mshc) = {
+       .name           = "rockchip_rk2928_dw_mshc",
+       .id             = UCLASS_MMC,
+       .of_match       = rockchip_dwmmc_ids,
+       .ofdata_to_platdata = rockchip_dwmmc_ofdata_to_platdata,
+       .ops            = &dm_dwmci_ops,
+       .bind           = rockchip_dwmmc_bind,
+       .probe          = rockchip_dwmmc_probe,
+       .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct rockchip_dwmmc_priv),
+       .platdata_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct rockchip_mmc_plat),
+};
+
  U_BOOT_DRIVER(rockchip_dwmmc_drv) = {
         .name           = "rockchip_rk3288_dw_mshc",
         .id             = UCLASS_MMC,
-       .of_match       = rockchip_dwmmc_ids,
I think you ne
         .ofdata_to_platdata = rockchip_dwmmc_ofdata_to_platdata,
         .ops            = &dm_dwmci_ops,
         .bind           = rockchip_dwmmc_bind,
--
2.7.4

Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot


_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to