On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:37:19AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > We do not need to probe the block device here, so avoid doing so. The MMC > device itself must be active, but the block device can come later. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > --- > > drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c > index 4dc3925fe6..994d2686f4 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct mmc *find_mmc_device(int dev_num) > struct udevice *dev, *mmc_dev; > int ret; > > - ret = blk_get_device(IF_TYPE_MMC, dev_num, &dev); > + ret = blk_find_device(IF_TYPE_MMC, dev_num, &dev); > > if (ret) { > #if !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) || defined(CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT) > @@ -108,7 +108,9 @@ struct mmc *find_mmc_device(int dev_num) > > mmc_dev = dev_get_parent(dev); > > - return mmc_get_mmc_dev(mmc_dev); > + struct mmc *mmc = mmc_get_mmc_dev(mmc_dev); > + > + return mmc;
We should declare new variables at the top of the function here, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot