On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:37:19AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> We do not need to probe the block device here, so avoid doing so. The MMC
> device itself must be active, but the block device can come later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c
> index 4dc3925fe6..994d2686f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct mmc *find_mmc_device(int dev_num)
> struct udevice *dev, *mmc_dev;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = blk_get_device(IF_TYPE_MMC, dev_num, &dev);
> + ret = blk_find_device(IF_TYPE_MMC, dev_num, &dev);
>
> if (ret) {
> #if !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) || defined(CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT)
> @@ -108,7 +108,9 @@ struct mmc *find_mmc_device(int dev_num)
>
> mmc_dev = dev_get_parent(dev);
>
> - return mmc_get_mmc_dev(mmc_dev);
> + struct mmc *mmc = mmc_get_mmc_dev(mmc_dev);
> +
> + return mmc;We should declare new variables at the top of the function here, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
