On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:32:06AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 22/05/17 21:49, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 01:59:33AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > >> As the kernel DT does not have an Ethernet driver and bindings, lets > >> (re-)add the DT bindings for U-Boot's sun8i EMAC Ethernet driver, which > >> got lost when syncing the kernel DT to U-Boot. > >> This slightly updates the DT nodes to adapt to the new DT (clock and > >> reset nodes), but keeps the rest the same to let it work with the > >> existing U-Boot driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> > >> --- > >> arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-plus.dts | 14 +++++++++++++- > >> arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts | 1 + > >> arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 33 > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > NAK, please start making use of -u-boot.dtsi files for these so they > > won't keep getting lost. > > Ah, thanks for the heads up, wasn't aware of that. > I changed this patch, it looks quite neat now since this non-standard > binding is now in a separate file and the original .dts files match > exactly the Linux versions. Also it is expected that we will need to > change these nodes anyway to match the upcoming Linux Ethernet bindings. > > One thing I noticed is that the binman/ node got lost with this > approach, is that because the -u-boot.dtsi scheme can only deal with one > addon file and stops looking on the first hit (skipping sunxi-u-boot.dtsi)?
Ah, I think we've found another problem to fix then, yes. Today we only allow one -u-boot.dtsi, but really we should allow for N of them, and allow for more specific ones (ie board-u-boot.dtsi) to override less specific (ie soc-u-boot.dtsi) ones, just like regular DTS files, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
