On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:16:52AM +0200, Jorge Ramirez wrote: > On 05/12/2017 12:32 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>ummmm I am a bit lost at this point, could we recap please? > >Sure. > > > >>let's see: I need to use the pl01x uart on an aarch64 platform and I > >>dont need to enable any clocks for uboot in my SoC. Not now, > >>unlikely ever. > >> > >>Doing what other boards have done to this date is no longer > >>acceptable (ie platform data for the pl01x or using uboots "clock" > >>property embedded in the hacked device trees) > >The only thing we all agree on right now is that "clock" is wrong and > >must be replaced. I've decided we need to discuss bringing in platform > >data for pl01x. Once we resolve this, then you can re-spin the series > >(and hopefully have the USB nodes be submitted to Linux too, since > >they're the standard ones and, uh, should just enable USB on your board > >in the kernel too..) Thanks! > > cool, that sounds great, thanks. > > yeah the usb nodes should be ready pretty soon, I have seen them > circulating already. > > btw, what was it that triggered our discussion? it is not like any > of the dts files for armv8 boards are verbatim copies of what you > find in the kernel.
They've gotten out of sync? Sigh.. I suppose this starts to push me from the "keep them in the kernel" camp to "push them to a separate authoritative repository" camp. I do know some of the early boards were out of sync, but that shouldn't be the case moving forward, and isn't the case for ARMv7 things. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
