On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:33:47AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 03:27:41PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Antoine Tenart
> > <antoine.ten...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:04:18AM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > >> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 11:13:27PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > >> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 03:29:54PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > +static void __secure sunxi_clock_leave_idle(struct sunxi_ccm_reg
> > >> > > *ccm)
> > >> > > +{
> > >> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_MACH_SUN7I
> > >> > > + /* switch cpuclk to osc24m */
> > >> > > + clrsetbits_le32(&ccm->cpu_ahb_apb0_cfg, 0x3 << CPU_CLK_SRC_SHIFT,
> > >> > > + CPU_CLK_SRC_OSC24M << CPU_CLK_SRC_SHIFT);
> > >> > > +#endif
> > >> >
> > >> > Is that really needed? Whatever state we're in at this point, we just
> > >> > want to switch back to the PLL1, right?
> > >>
> > >> I think it wasn't working for some reasons if we didn't switch to osc24m
> > >> first, but that was a while ago. I can test again.
> > >
> > > It seems to work without switching back to osc24m first. I'll remove
> > > this.
> >
> > This is probably going to work badly with the sunxi-ng clock driver
> > in Linux, which will temporarily switch over to osc24M while changing
> > the clock rate of PLL1, then switch back.
>
> It doesn't do so for the A20, only the later SoCs.
>
> I'm not sure whether using cpufreq and cpuidle at the same time is
> valid either.This is cluster wise, cpuclk with be switched to losc (or osc24m) only if all CPU are in the idle state. Likewise, the first CPU to leave this state will switch back cpuclk to pll1. So that shouldn't be an issue for the sunxi-ng clock driver in Linux. Antoine -- Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
