Am Sonntag, 26. März 2017, 22:52:16 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > Am Sonntag, 26. März 2017, 22:41:35 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > > Am Sonntag, 26. März 2017, 22:13:08 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > > > Am Sonntag, 26. März 2017, 14:00:51 CEST schrieb Simon Glass: > > > > Hi Heiko, > > > > > > > > On 26 March 2017 at 13:59, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi Heiko, > > > > > > > > > > On 26 March 2017 at 13:06, Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de> wrote: > > > > >> Hi Simon, > > > > >> > > > > >> Am Samstag, 25. März 2017, 20:39:08 CEST schrieb Simon Glass: > > > > >>> On 23 March 2017 at 17:41, Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de> wrote: > > > > >>> > The Rock is a RK3188 based single board computer by Radxa. > > > > >>> > Currently it still relies on the proprietary DDR init and > > > > >>> > cannot use the generic SPL, but at least is able to boot > > > > >>> > a linux kernel and system up to a regular login prompt. > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de> > > > > >>> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > >>> > Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.y...@rock-chips.com> > > > > >>> > --- > > > > >>> > arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 1 + > > > > >>> > arch/arm/dts/rk3188-radxarock.dts | 382 > > > > >>> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > >>> > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3188/Kconfig | 11 + > > > > >>> > board/radxa/rock/Kconfig | 15 ++ > > > > >>> > board/radxa/rock/MAINTAINERS | 6 + > > > > >>> > board/radxa/rock/Makefile | 7 + > > > > >>> > board/radxa/rock/rock.c | 7 + > > > > >>> > configs/rock_defconfig | 58 ++++++ > > > > >>> > include/configs/rock.h | 30 +++ > > > > >>> > 9 files changed, 517 insertions(+) > > > > >>> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3188-radxarock.dts > > > > >>> > create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock/Kconfig > > > > >>> > create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock/MAINTAINERS > > > > >>> > create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock/Makefile > > > > >>> > create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock/rock.c > > > > >>> > create mode 100644 configs/rock_defconfig > > > > >>> > create mode 100644 include/configs/rock.h > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I am still having trouble applying this patch. I get build errors: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> arm: + rock > > > > >>> +arch/arm/Makefile:22: CONFIG_CPU_V7 -march=armv7-a > > > > >>> +make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'dts/dt.dtb', needed by > > > > >>> 'tpl/u-boot-tpl.dtb'. Stop. > > > > >>> +make[1]: *** [tpl/u-boot-tpl.bin] Error 2 > > > > >>> +make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > > > >>> 0 0 1 /1 rock > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Also there seems to be a duplicate config: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> arm: + rock > > > > >>> +In file included from include/configs/rock.h:11:0, > > > > >>> + from include/config.h:5, > > > > >>> + from include/common.h:21, > > > > >>> + from arch/arm/lib/asm-offsets.c:15: > > > > >>> + #define CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD > > > > >>> + ^ > > > > >>> + from lib/asm-offsets.c:15: > > > > >>> +In file included from include/linux/kconfig.h:4:0, > > > > >>> + from <command-line>:0: > > > > >>> +include/generated/autoconf.h:10:0: note: this is the location of > > > > >>> the > > > > >>> previous definition > > > > >>> + #define CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD 1 > > > > >> > > > > >> looks like this got run over by another Kconfig migration on > > > > >> march-18. > > > > >> New patches (migration + rock board) coming up shortly. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks - what toolchain are you using to test this? > > > > > > > > Also I am still getting this error: > > > > > > > > buildman rock$ > > > > boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do. > > > > Building current source for 1 boards (1 thread, 8 jobs per thread) > > > > arm: + rock > > > > +make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'dts/dt.dtb', needed by > > > > 'tpl/u-boot-tpl.dtb'. Stop. > > > > +make[1]: *** [tpl/u-boot-tpl.bin] Error 2 > > > > +make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > > > 0 0 1 /1 rock > > > > > > that is really strange. > > > > > > I'm building with the armhf cross-compiler from Debian testing, which is > > > > > > arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Debian 6.3.0-5) 6.3.0 20170124 > > > > > > My git history also is up-to-date it seems: > > > 14ef0b180b rockchip: rk3188: Add Radxa Rock board > > > d0348986cc rockchip: rk3188: follow THUMB_BUILD Kconfig migration > > > 3bffe88d68 rockchip: video: Split out HDMI controller code > > > a188a5a35c rockchip: i2c: Add compatibles for Rockchip Cortex-A9 socs > > > 903fae5666 rockchip: rk3188: Setup the armclk in spl > > > 7957cc4bd0 rockchip: clk: rk3188: Allow configuration of the armclk > > > > > > with 3bffe88d68 being your current head and my build commands being > > > > > > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- clean > > > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- rock_defconfig > > > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- > > > > that also works with a "make mrproper" before everything else. > > > > > > > Strangely the tpl shouldn't require a dtb at all, as it needs to use > > > OF_PLATDATA. Am I missing some config option somewhere? > > > > I also did play around a bit with buildman just now: > > > > At first I forgot the "$" after rock, so build everything with rock in the > > name and the radxarock failed because the somewhat old 4.9 toolchain > > used seems to produce a TPL image that is over the size constraints. > > I.e. 1020 bytes on 4.9 vs. 792 bytes on 6.3.0 . > > > > When I drop the SPL_MAX_SIZE from rk3188_common.h for the TPL build > > tools/buildman/buildman -P rock > > builds 14 boards and finishes sucessfully including the radxarock. > > > > > > Now when I try buildman -P rock$ I seem to also get the error about the > > missing dts/dt.dtb , which does not occur in my regular builds and also > > not when building the bigger number of boards. I guess I need to figure > > out what is different in that case. > > sorry for spamming, but > > also when entering .bm-work/rock where buildman failed and doing just my > > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- > > in that directory created by buildman, produces perfectly fine images. > (buildman does create the .config, so I'm just finishing the build, buildman > failed at for unknown reasons)
and a tools/buildman/buildman -PVv -T1 -j1 rock$ also finishes sucessfully, so it looks like that is more some sort of build concurrency issue, with the platdata not being created in time for some reason. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot