Hi Tom, > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 8:18 AM > To: Vikas MANOCHA <vikas.mano...@st.com> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/10] stm32f7: add clock and pin control > drivers > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 03:36:29PM +0000, Vikas MANOCHA wrote: > > Thanks Tom, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 7:39 AM > > > To: Vikas MANOCHA <vikas.mano...@st.com> > > > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] stm32f7: add clock and pin control > > > drivers > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:33:58PM +0000, Vikas MANOCHA wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > If it is ok, please apply this patchset. > > > > > > I'll pick it up early in the next release, thanks! > > > > Ok, great which means wk'11 (week of March 13th), is it right. > > > > I was waiting for this patchset (let us say p1) apply on master before > > sending another series (let us say p2 : ready at my end for quite some > > time) applicable on top of p1. > > In general, is it ok to send the new patchset (e.g. p2) mentioning > > its dependency (e.g. on p1) or one must have to wait for dependency > > patches (p1) to be on master. > > Yes, sending one series that depends on another series is fine, it's just on > you to manage those dependencies :) Thanks!
Yes sure :-), thanks for this info, appreciate it. Rgds, Vikas > > -- > Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
