On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 03:36:29PM +0000, Vikas MANOCHA wrote: > Thanks Tom, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 7:39 AM > > To: Vikas MANOCHA <vikas.mano...@st.com> > > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] stm32f7: add clock and pin control drivers > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:33:58PM +0000, Vikas MANOCHA wrote: > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > If it is ok, please apply this patchset. > > > > I'll pick it up early in the next release, thanks! > > Ok, great which means wk'11 (week of March 13th), is it right. > > I was waiting for this patchset (let us say p1) apply on master before > sending another series (let us say p2 : ready at my end for quite some > time) applicable on top of p1. > In general, is it ok to send the new patchset (e.g. p2) mentioning > its dependency (e.g. on p1) or one must have to wait for dependency > patches (p1) to be on master.
Yes, sending one series that depends on another series is fine, it's just on you to manage those dependencies :) Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
